Skip to content

More budget smoke and mirrors

January 26, 2010

Obama’s attempt this week to recast himself as some kind of budget-cutter is laughable if it weren’t so cynical and calculated to fool people who are not paying attention.  I could try to analyze it, but Cato has done it well already.  Although I recommend reading the whole article in full, here’s a good bit:

it’s only down in the fifth paragraph where the [New York] Times notes that “The estimated $250 billion in savings over 10 years would be less than 3 percent of the roughly $9 trillion in additional deficits the government is expected to accumulate over that time.”

The way this stuff is reported is downright criminal.  Author Jason Kuznicki points out:

Spending increases that were planned all along aren’t considered increases at all and do not make the news. Unplanned increases, those over and above the planned ones, are reported as though only the unplanned parts were increases. Large spending increases get extra praise for boldness. Reductions in the rate of spending growth are called “spending cuts.” Real though tiny cuts are described as draconian measures.

I remember the howls of protest when Reagan merely slowed the rate of spending growth.   And here is Obama raising spending by $9 trillion and then announcing cuts of a mere $250 billion–pure Alinsky.

To put the numbers in perspective, that’s $250 billion out of $9,000 billion.  (Yes, a trillion is a thousand billion)  And today, Reuters reports:

U.S. President Barack Obama will freeze the salaries of senior White House officials and other top political appointees for savings of $4 million in fiscal 2011, a senior administration official said on Tuesday.

This is likely to be mentioned in the State of the Union address.  Really?  The largest, most expensive White House staff in history and he’s going to save $4 million?  That’s such a small number as a fraction of the budget my calculator can’t even figure the fraction without using scientific notation.

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. January 27, 2010 5:39 pm

    Ed Morrisey’s poll on the PPC has 66% saying we should support it as a good start and demand more. Are these people kidding? Obama’s not serious. I’m more for the treat is as a fraud option.

  2. P.J. permalink
    March 5, 2010 2:52 pm

    Not spending (borrowing) $250 billion dollars over ten years is NOT the same as saving it.

    If I save money that means I already have it in my account and am not spending it. But all our buddy, Barack, is doing is not going deeper into an already out of control debt by $250 billion. Which, by the way, is infinitesimal compared to the trillions upon trillions of government paper outstanding.

    You’ve got to love the spin that Washington puts on things. Noam Chompsky would have a field day.

Trackbacks

  1. Barack Obama: Get Out of Debt by Maintaining Out-of-Control Spending? | People's Press Collective Beta

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: